Kratom, WHO and UN: Legality

The Expert Committee on Drug Dependence (ECDD) of the World Health Organization (WHO) organized a series of meetings on the implementation of the international drug control treaties at the end of 2021, which resulted in a final report with conclusions and recommendations on some substances. The substances analyzed and considered as a harm or risk to health underwent a critical review and may be included in the list of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (1961) or in the Single Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971) of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

Seven substances were analyzed, and three were scheduled (Brorphine, Metonitazene and Ethylone). The other four (4F-MDMB-BICA, Benzilone, Kratom -and its numerous alkaloids- and Phenibut) were kept under surveillance; the same status they had before the meeting.

“The current report shows that there is no reason to consider kratom and its alkaloids as a harmful substance. This could influence decisions at institutional, regional and national levels.”

The fact that kratom remains as a substance under monitoring means that WHO still considers it to have the potential to cause harm to public health, but after further analysis there is insufficient evidence to recommend a critical review, as the risk of abuse or dependence is low, as is the extent of the social and public health problems caused by it, even considering that there are vast numbers of people who report using it as self-medication for a variety of disorders and conditions, such as pain, opioid withdrawal, opioid use disorders, anxiety and depression, in addition to its millennial use as a traditional medicine in Southeast Asian countries.

Between 15-16 million people use kratom in the United States. To this must be added a few million more in Southeast Asia, where it is native from. As its popularity is increasing in Europe, organizations such as the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) have placed the substance under surveillance, although with the recent publication by the UN and WHO of the current report showing that there is no reason to consider kratom and its alkaloids as a harmful substance, this could influence decisions at institutional, regional and national levels.

Maintaining the legality of kratom is important not only for those who use the plant to deal with quality of life issues, but also for ongoing research to determine the basic pharmacology and potential therapeutic value of kratom and its constituent alkaloids.

20 thoughts on “Kratom, WHO and UN: Legality”

  1. I really hope kratom maintains legality! It has been a TOTAL lifesaver when it comes to managing stress and staying focused during my busy academic schedule. It gives me a nice energy boost that helps me power through long study sessions and classes and stay motivated. It’s like a wave of positivity washes over me, and I just feel more relaxed and happier overall and it’s easier to keep pushing through. Kratom has also been a really big help in managing my chronic knee pain from a sports injury! I genuinely don’t know what I would do without it

  2. I started struggling with some major anxiety and stress in my life a few years ago. I tried therapy and diff medications but nothing seemed to work. A friend suggested I try kratom, and ever since it has been an essential part of my wellness routine. It isnt a “magic” pill by any means, but it gives me the support I needed to navigate life’s challenges with a clearer mind

  3. There is no reason to consider kratom a “harmful” substance. It really helps the people who use it

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *